Statement Under ScrutinyThe SUS is the statement of focus which other authoritative statements of either a conflicting or supporting nature are listed for in the Comparative Statements of Evidence section.
The padlock icon - - is always present as a reminder that a SUS field cannot be edited again after it has been created and saved and is verified as existing in the source document exactly as shown. If the SUS cannot be confirmed, a warning will be displayed below and the entire SUS page will be automatically deleted soon unless a valid URL to the resource can be provided. If you make a mistake quoting the source, just create a new SUS with this form again and the old SUS will get deleted later.
A simple repeal would be worse for Americans with pre-existing conditions, but the current bill would be worse for older Americans who are relatively healthy.
Margot Sanger-Katz, "Fewer Americans Would Be Insured With G.O.P. Plan Than With Simple Repeal," The New York Times, The New York Times Company, sec. The Upshot, 2017/03/21 00:00:00, https://www.nytimes.com/2017/03/21/upshot/fewer-americans-would-be-insured-with-gop-plan-than-with-simple-repeal.html (accessed: ). check archive.is
Follow the evidence trail by clicking the evidence statements below.
|URL Page Title:|