Jump to: navigation, search
SUS Checks If there are any problems verifying the SUS it will be manually reviewed by an administrator as soon as possible. Please allow up to 24 hours. The status' are not updated again after they pass initial checks. The Fact Checker will indicate if SUS are no longer found at a given URL. Check the archive through the Fact Checker menu or via the archive link on this page to view the original SUS.
By: Anonymous on 18:44, 22 October 2017

Statement Under Scrutinylock.pngThe SUS is the statement of focus which other authoritative statements of either a conflicting or supporting nature are listed for in the Comparative Statements of Evidence section.
The padlock icon - lock.png - is always present as a reminder that a SUS field cannot be edited again after it has been created and saved and is verified as existing in the source document exactly as shown. If the SUS cannot be confirmed, a warning will be displayed below and the entire SUS page will be automatically deleted soon unless a valid URL to the resource can be provided. If you make a mistake quoting the source, just create a new SUS with this form again and the old SUS will get deleted later.

Media Falsely Reports Trump’s EPA Is ‘Weakening Radiation Safety Levels’


See other statements that reference this one:   Page View    Properties View

Comparative Statements of EvidenceA list of supporting, contradicting, and other relevant, reliable, and authoritative evidential statements.


Follow the evidence trail by clicking the evidence statements below.

==Analysis Author attempts to place blame on the Obama administration for a policy statement approved and released during the Trump administration. Whether or not the radiation levels were being reviewed earlier is irrelevant as the policy was approved for dissemination under the new director of the EPA, part of the Trump administration.

External links

URL Page Title:
Short URL: