Jump to: navigation, search
SUS Checks If there are any problems verifying the SUS it will be manually reviewed by an administrator as soon as possible. Please allow up to 24 hours. The status' are not updated again after they pass initial checks. The Fact Checker will indicate if SUS are no longer found at a given URL. Check the archive through the Fact Checker menu or via the archive link on this page to view the original SUS.
URL: PASSED
SUS: PASSED
By: Anonymous on 19:02, 14 December 2016

Statement Under Scrutinylock.pngThe SUS is the statement of focus which other authoritative statements of either a conflicting or supporting nature are listed for in the Comparative Statements of Evidence section.
The padlock icon - lock.png - is always present as a reminder that a SUS field cannot be edited again after it has been created and saved and is verified as existing in the source document exactly as shown. If the SUS cannot be confirmed, a warning will be displayed below and the entire SUS page will be automatically deleted soon unless a valid URL to the resource can be provided. If you make a mistake quoting the source, just create a new SUS with this form again and the old SUS will get deleted later.

they now have “high confidence” that the Russian government was behind the theft of emails and documents from the Democratic National Committee

David E. Sanger, "Spy Agency Consensus Grows That Russia Hacked D.N.C.," The New York Times, © 2016 The New York Times Company, sec. Politics, , http://www.nytimes.com/2016/07/27/us/politics/spy-agency-consensus-grows-that-russia-hacked-dnc.html (accessed: ). check archive.is

Tags: DNC email hack, Russia, Espionage, Document leak, Wikileaks.org


See other statements that reference this one:   Page View    Properties View











Comparative Statements of EvidenceA list of supporting, contradicting, and other relevant, reliable, and authoritative evidential statements.

Tip

Follow the evidence trail by clicking the evidence statements below.


But see It makes much more sense to me that the Russian government had nothing to do with this, but that Russian-speaking hackers did it on their own for fun or profit or both

Jeffrey Carr, CEO, Taia Global, qtd. in Lauren Carroll, "What we know about Russia's role in the DNC email leak," PolitiFact, Tampa Bay Times, 2016/01/31 06:13:00 PM, http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/article/2016/jul/31/what-we-know-about-russias-role-dnc-email-leak/ (accessed: ). check archive.is

According to There’s no evidence that this was done by the state itself, only evidence it was done by non-state actors that might be Russian-speaking

Jeffery Carr, CEO, Taia Global, qtd. in Kassia Halcli, "Does the U.S. government really know who hacked Democrats’ emails?," PBS NewsHour, NewsHour Productions LLC., 2016/10/26 12:08:00 PM, http://www.pbs.org/newshour/rundown/does-government-know-hacked-emails/ (accessed: ). check archive.is

But see Circumstantial, yes, but strong enough to be the operating assumption for the intelligence community

Susan Hennessey, Brookings Inst., qtd. in Lauren Carroll, "What we know about Russia's role in the DNC email leak," PolitiFact, Tampa Bay Times, 2016/01/31 06:13:00, http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/article/2016/jul/31/what-we-know-about-russias-role-dnc-email-leak/ (accessed: ). check archive.is

But see I don’t know what [evidence] they have that couldn’t have been faked

Cris Thomas, aka Space Rogue, Tenable Network Security, qtd. in Kassia Halcli, "Does the U.S. government really know who hacked Democrats’ emails?," PBS NewsHour, NewsHour Productions LLC., 2016/10/26 12:08:00 PM, http://www.pbs.org/newshour/rundown/does-government-know-hacked-emails/ (accessed: ). check archive.is

But see But indicators of identity like timestamps, language preferences and IP addresses “can be manipulated or faked rather easily,”

Juan Andres Guerrero-Saade, Kaspersky Lab, qtd. in Kassia Halcli, "Does the U.S. government really know who hacked Democrats’ emails?," PBS NewsHour, NewsHour Productions LLC., 2016/10/26 12:08:00 PM, http://www.pbs.org/newshour/rundown/does-government-know-hacked-emails/ (accessed: ). check archive.is

Credited Articles/Blog Posts/etc.Use this section to give credit to the investigative reporter, blogger, website, etc., if their reporting or post was helpful in finding evidence related to the SUS or CSEs.

AnalysisUse this section to talk about how the SUS and evidence relate to each other or any other important details as well as links to other SUS pages and Tag pages that group related SUS. Avoid long discussions about the general topic or issue to which this SUS is a part since this page may be just one of many SUS pages for a particular topic. It is generally better to provide a short description with a link to internal or external pages.

External links

URL Page Title:
Short URL: